Eat SafelyIn Florida
Home/Saint Petersburg/JIMMYS TACOS STP

JIMMYS TACOS STP

2534 CENTRAL AVE, Saint Petersburg FL 33712

Last inspected Jul 29, 2026 · 2 visits since January 2026

Licence typeRestaurant
Seats120
Risk levelRisk Level 2
LicenceSEA6218835
Grade history
JAN 26
JUL 26
Worst finding on record
Live, small flying insects found (2) Flies near dish pit area. Operator has been educated on the issues with vermin and has been informed how to prevent further issue.
High priority/35A-02-7
Badges — none earned
★ Spotless◆ Clean streak● Perfect year✓ Never fined

Awarded on the inspection record alone. What they mean →

Inspection history

2 visits, newest first

Jul 29, 2026Inspection Completed - No Further ActionRoutine Inspection

Met inspection standards. 14 violations recorded, none serious enough to require a return visit.

4 High priority4 Intermediate6 Basic
What the inspector wrote — 14 findings
Live, small flying insects found (2) Flies near dish pit area. Operator has been educated on the issues with vermin and has been informed how to prevent further issue.
High priority/35A-02-7
Raw animal food stored over/not properly separated from ready-to-eat food. Shelled eggs stored over ready to eat food.
High priority/08A-05-6
Time/temperature control for safety food cold held at greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit. sour cream (68F - Cold Holding); pico (68F - Cold Holding) Operator took action by placing pico and sour cream containers inside of reach in to decrease initial temperature. Items were re-temped at: sour cream (50F - Cold Holding); pico (51F - Cold Holding)
High priority/03A-02-5/Corrective Action Taken
Toxic substance/chemical improperly stored. Bug spray was kept on top of reach in cooler near back of kitchen.
High priority/41-10-4/Corrected On-Site
Show the remaining 10 findings ▾
Chemical test kit not used to ensure proper sanitization of equipment and utensils when using a chemical sanitizer. Operator had test kits sealed in original packaging.
Intermediate/16-33-4/Repeat Violation
Establishment has no written procedures for employees to follow in response to a vomiting or diarrheal event where the vomit or diarrhea is discharged onto surfaces in the establishment.
Intermediate/11-27-4
Incorrect chemical test kit provided for measuring the concentration of the sanitizer solution used in the three-compartment sink and/or dishmachine. Operator had only chlorine sanitizing strips but not quaternary. For triple sink.
Intermediate/16-32-5
No probe thermometer provided to measure temperature of food products.
Intermediate/05-08-4
Food stored on floor. Tortillas stored in cooler on the floor on the far end of cook line nearest to the wall.
Basic/08B-38-4
In-use utensil not stored with handle above the top of time/temperature control for safety food and rim of the container. Spoon handle in guacamole container in reach in under hot line.
Basic/10-06-5
No Heimlich maneuver/choking sign posted.
Basic/51-13-4
No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. The two sinks in the kitchen lacked proper handwashing signs at hand sink. The sink at the bar lacked a proper handwashing signs sign. Inspector sent over education packet in order to provide proper handwashing signage.
Basic/31B-04-4/Corrective Action Taken/Repeat Violation
Outer openings not protected during operation and vermin and/or environmental cross contamination present. Back door to walk in was propped open allowing possible vermin to enter premises.
Basic/35B-05-4/Corrected On-Site
Soiled dry wiping cloth in use. Dry wiping clots used to wipe down surfaces with no sign of sanitation bucket.
Basic/21-10-4
The state's own report →
Jan 13, 2026Inspection Completed - No Further ActionLicensing Inspection

Met inspection standards. 1 violations recorded, none serious enough to require a return visit.

0 High priority0 Intermediate1 Basic
Show 1 finding ▾
No handwashing sign provided at a hand sink used by food employees. Missing at all handsink throughout. Provided hand washing sign.
Basic/31B-04-4

This record follows the licence, not the owner. Restaurants change hands and the licence history normally does not, so an older entry may describe people who no longer run the place. Every inspection above links to the state's own report. Something wrong? Tell us.